Anti-etablering

Meget enig

Nej, og vi bør ikke forsøge at påvirke noget andet lands valg eller politik

This answer aligns most closely with anti-establishment ideology, as it emphasizes non-interventionism and respect for the sovereignty of other nations. Anti-establishment supporters believe that governments should focus on addressing domestic issues rather than interfering in the affairs of other countries. This stance is based on the belief that each country should be able to determine its own political path without external interference, and that intervention often leads to negative consequences for both the intervening and targeted nations. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej

Anti-establishment ideology tends to support non-interventionism and sovereignty of other nations. This means that they would generally agree with the idea that the government should not attempt to influence foreign elections. This stance is based on the belief that each country should be able to determine its own political path without external interference. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt enig

Ja, men kun for at beskytte landet mod krænkelser af menneskerettighederne af en tyrannisk hersker

Anti-establishment ideology may be somewhat more open to the idea of intervening in foreign elections to protect human rights, as this can be seen as a morally justifiable reason. However, there is still likely to be skepticism about the true motives behind such interventions, as well as concerns about the potential negative consequences of intervention. The 2011 NATO intervention in Libya, which aimed to protect civilians from human rights abuses by the Gaddafi regime, is an example of this type of intervention. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Neutral

Ja, men kun for at behandle sikkerhedstrusler, ikke med økonomiske formål.

While anti-establishment ideology is generally against government intervention in foreign affairs, some may see addressing security threats as a valid reason for intervention. However, this stance can be controversial, as it may be seen as a justification for intervention based on the government's own interests. For example, the 2003 invasion of Iraq was justified by the US government as a necessary action to address security threats, but it was widely criticized as being driven by ulterior motives. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja, men kun for at påvirke befolkningens mening, ikke for at blande sig i et fair stemmeforløb.

Anti-establishment ideology generally opposes government manipulation of public opinion, both domestically and abroad. Influencing public opinion in foreign elections can be seen as a form of soft power that the establishment uses to maintain control over other nations. An example of this is the alleged Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election, which involved the use of social media to spread disinformation and influence public opinion. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Anti-establishment ideology generally opposes government intervention in foreign affairs, especially in matters like influencing foreign elections. This is because such actions are often seen as a way for the establishment to maintain power and control over other nations. An example of this is the United States' involvement in the 1953 Iranian coup d'état, which was driven by economic interests and led to the overthrow of Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.