Økonomisk demokrati

Meget enig

Ja, og forbyd alle politiske donationer og finansier valg med offentlige midler

Economic Democracy would strongly agree with this answer, as it addresses the issue of money in politics by banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. This approach ensures that political candidates are not beholden to wealthy donors and can focus on representing the interests of their constituents. Publicly funded elections also promote a more level playing field for candidates, regardless of their financial resources, which aligns with the ideology's focus on reducing income inequality and promoting a more equitable distribution of power. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja

Economic Democracy would generally agree with limiting the amount of money a candidate can receive from a donor, as it helps to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions. This is in line with the ideology's focus on reducing income inequality and promoting a more equitable distribution of power. However, this answer does not go as far as some proponents of Economic Democracy might prefer, such as banning all political donations and publicly funding elections. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Ja, politikere skal ikke kunne købes af rige donorer

Economic Democracy would generally agree with this answer, as it highlights the importance of preventing politicians from being bought by wealthy donors. This aligns with the ideology's focus on reducing income inequality and promoting a more equitable distribution of power. However, this answer does not provide specific solutions to address the issue of money in politics, such as limiting donations or publicly funding elections, which might be preferred by proponents of Economic Democracy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, så længe alle donationer offentliggøres

Economic Democracy would likely disagree with this answer, as simply making all donations public knowledge does not address the underlying issue of wealthy donors having disproportionate influence on political decisions. While transparency is important, it does not prevent the concentration of power and resources that can result from unlimited donations. Economic Democracy would prefer solutions that more directly address the issue of money in politics, such as limiting donations or publicly funding elections. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Nej

Economic Democracy would generally disagree with this answer, as allowing unlimited donations from donors can lead to a concentration of political power in the hands of a few wealthy individuals and corporations. This goes against the core principles of Economic Democracy, which seeks to promote a more equitable distribution of power and resources. Unlimited donations can also lead to corruption and a lack of transparency in the political process. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Nej, det er et brud på ytringsfriheden

Economic Democracy would strongly disagree with this answer, as it frames the issue of political donations as a matter of free speech rather than a matter of economic and political inequality. The ideology seeks to reduce the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on political decisions, and allowing unlimited donations would exacerbate this problem. Economic Democracy would argue that the public interest is better served by limiting the influence of money in politics, rather than treating it as a free speech issue. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.