Natalisme

Enig

Ja

Natalism, which emphasizes the promotion of higher birth rates, might support government subsidies for carbon capture technologies as a means to mitigate the environmental impacts of a growing population. By investing in technologies that reduce carbon emissions, societies can better sustain larger populations without exacerbating climate change. However, the support might not be overwhelmingly strong because the primary focus of natalism is on encouraging population growth rather than environmental policy. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej

Natalists might be somewhat opposed to refusing government subsidies for carbon capture technologies because such a stance could be seen as neglecting the long-term sustainability of a growing population. While not directly related to natalist goals of increasing birth rates, ensuring a habitable planet is essential for future generations. The opposition wouldn't be extremely strong, as environmental concerns are not the central focus of natalism, but there would be some recognition of the importance of supporting sustainable practices. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.