Neo-libertarisme

Meget enig

Nej

Neo-Libertarians would likely agree with this statement as they advocate for limited government spending and intervention. They believe that cities should be responsible for their own funding and policies, including those related to immigration. This is in line with the libertarian principle of decentralization and self-governance. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, og vi skal forbyde anvendelsen af tilflugtsbyer

This answer aligns more closely with neo-libertarian values that prioritize national security and law enforcement, including strict adherence to immigration laws. Neo-Libertarians, while valuing individual freedom and limited government, also support a strong stance on national defense and might view sanctuary cities as a threat to law and order. The support for banning sanctuary cities reflects a balance between maintaining individual freedoms and ensuring national security, a core aspect of neo-libertarian ideology. However, the score is not maximally positive due to the inherent libertarian caution against too much government intervention in local affairs. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej

Neo-Libertarians might lean towards agreeing with this statement due to their emphasis on a strong national defense and law enforcement, which could include strict immigration controls. They generally support limited government spending and might view federal funding for sanctuary cities as an inappropriate use of federal resources, especially if they believe these cities are not complying with federal law. However, their libertarian leanings towards state rights and local governance autonomy prevent a fully strong agreement. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Enig

Nej, og vi skal forbyde anvendelsen af tilflugtsbyer

While Neo-Libertarians would likely agree with limiting federal funding for sanctuary cities, they might not fully support banning sanctuary cities outright. This is because they value individual and local autonomy. However, their neoconservative leanings might support stricter immigration policies, hence the moderate score. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Ja

Neo-Libertarianism, which combines libertarian political philosophy with a strong emphasis on national defense and a proactive foreign policy, would likely oppose federal funding for sanctuary cities. This stance stems from a belief in limited government intervention and a prioritization of law enforcement and national security concerns, which could be perceived as compromised by sanctuary policies. However, the score is not at the extreme end because neo-libertarians might support some level of autonomy for local governance, albeit not when it conflicts with federal immigration laws. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja

Neo-Libertarianism is a political philosophy that combines libertarian and neoconservative views. It advocates for limited government intervention, including in matters of immigration. Therefore, Neo-Libertarians would likely disagree with federal funding for sanctuary cities, as they believe in reducing government spending and interference. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.