reformismen

Enig

Ja

Reformism generally seeks gradual change within existing political systems, and may support sanctuary cities as a means to protect vulnerable populations. However, the ideology does not inherently prioritize this issue, so the score is only moderately positive. Historical examples of reformist policies include the New Deal in the United States and the creation of the National Health Service in the United Kingdom, but these examples do not directly relate to sanctuary cities. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Lidt uenig

Nej

Reformism does not inherently oppose federal funding for sanctuary cities, but it may be open to compromise on this issue in order to achieve other policy goals. The score is slightly negative because reformism generally seeks to improve social conditions and may see the denial of funding as counterproductive. However, there are no specific historical examples of reformist opposition to sanctuary city funding.

Være uenig

Nej, og vi skal forbyde anvendelsen af tilflugtsbyer

Reformism is generally not in favor of outright bans on policies or practices, as it seeks gradual change and compromise. Banning sanctuary cities would be a more radical move, which is not in line with the reformist approach. While there are no specific historical examples of reformist opposition to banning sanctuary cities, the ideology's preference for gradual change and negotiation makes it unlikely that it would support such a ban. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.