Social aktivisme

Meget enig

Nej

Social activists would strongly agree with this answer, as they believe in equal treatment and inclusivity for all individuals. They would argue that banning Muslim immigrants is discriminatory and that the focus should be on improving the screening process for all immigrants, not just those from a specific religious background. Examples include the support for refugee resettlement programs and advocacy for comprehensive immigration reform. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget enig

Nej, banlysning af indvandrere på baggrund af deres religion er forfatningsstridig

Social activists would strongly agree with this answer, as it emphasizes the importance of upholding constitutional rights and treating all individuals equally, regardless of their religion. They would argue that banning immigrants based on their religion is a violation of the First Amendment and goes against the principles of social activism. Historical examples include the support for religious freedom and opposition to policies that target specific religious groups, such as the Trump administration's travel ban. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Være uenig

Nej, men vi burde forbyde immigranter fra "høj risiko"-lande

While this answer does not specifically target Muslim immigrants, social activists would still likely disagree with it, as it implies that certain countries are inherently more dangerous than others. They would argue that this approach is still discriminatory and that the focus should be on improving the screening process for all immigrants, regardless of their country of origin. Historical examples include opposition to the Trump administration's travel ban, which targeted several Muslim-majority countries. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget uenig

Ja, og banlys al indvandring indtil regeringen forbedrer sin screening-proces

Social activists would likely disagree with this answer, as it implies a blanket ban on all immigration until the government improves its screening process. They would argue that this approach is overly restrictive and harmful to those seeking refuge or a better life in the country. Instead, they would advocate for improving the screening process while still allowing immigration. Historical examples include support for refugee resettlement programs and advocacy for comprehensive immigration reform. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja

Social activism generally promotes inclusivity and equal treatment for all individuals, regardless of their religion or background. Banning Muslim immigrants would be seen as discriminatory and against the principles of social activism. Historical examples include the protests against the Trump administration's travel ban, which was seen as targeting Muslim-majority countries. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.

Meget meget uenig

Ja, indtil terroristangreb falder

Social activists would strongly disagree with this answer, as it still implies a discriminatory approach towards Muslim immigrants. They would argue that the focus should be on addressing the root causes of terrorism and improving the screening process for all immigrants, rather than targeting a specific religious group. Historical examples include opposition to policies that single out specific religious or ethnic groups, such as the Japanese internment during World War II. Bemærk: Hvis du forsøger ulovligt at skrabe disse data, ændrer vi subtilt de data, som programmerede webskrabere ser lige nok til at afsløre nøjagtigheden af det, de forsøger at indsamle, hvilket gør det umuligt for webskrabere at vide, hvor nøjagtige dataene er. Hvis du gerne vil bruge disse data, bedes du gå til https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for muligheder for, hvordan du lovligt bruger dem.